• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

公平关切下具有CSR意识的闭环供应链定价决策

刘珊1,姚锋敏1,陈东彦1,2   

  1. 1. 哈尔滨理工大学经济与管理学院, 哈尔滨 150080;2. 哈尔滨理工大学理学院,哈尔滨 150080
  • 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-04-19

刘珊,姚锋敏,陈东彦. 公平关切下具有CSR意识的闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(2): 383-400.

LIU Shan, YAO Fengmin, CHEN Dongyan. Pricing Decisions for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR Consciousness Under Fairness Concerns[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(2): 383-400.

Pricing Decisions for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR Consciousness Under Fairness Concerns

LIU Shan1 ,YAO Fengmin1 ,CHEN Dongyan 1,2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080; 2. School of Science, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080
  • Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-04-19

研究公平关切及企业社会责任 (CSR) 意识对闭环供应链定价决策的影响, 分别在零售商考虑不利公平关切以及有利公平关切两种情形下, 构建了考虑制造商CSR意识的闭环供应链定价决策模型, 分析了制造商的CSR意识及零售商的公平关切行为对新产品定价及废旧产品 回收的影响. 研究表明无论在何种情形下, 制造商的CSR意识均有利于降低新产 品批发价格及零售价格、扩大市场需求、提高废旧产品回收率. 通过比较不同情 形下的均衡结果发现, 制造商始终在零售商有利公平关切时获得更大的收益; 而 零售商始终在自身不利公平关切时获得更大的收益.

To study the influence of fairness concerns and corporate social responsibility (CSR) consciousness on pricing decisions for closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), the decision models of CLSC considering the manufacturer's CSR consciousness are constructed under two cases: Considering the retailer's unfavorable fairness concerns and favorable fairness concerns. The effect of manufacturer's CSR consciousness and the retailer's fairness concerns behavior to the pricing of new products and the recycling rate of waste products are analyzed. The research shows that the CSR consciousness of manufacturer is beneficial to reduce the wholesale and retail prices of new products, expands the market demand of new products and improves the recovery rate of waste products under any circumstances. By comparing the equilibrium results under different cases, it shows that the manufacturer always makes greater profits when the retailer considers the favorable fairness concerns, while, the retailer always makes greater profits when it considers the unfavorable fairness concerns.

()
[1] 于晓辉,李敏,叶兆兴,周珍,逄金辉. 基于公平关切的双渠道低碳供应链博弈分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(1): 221-237.
[2] 李春发,解雯倩,楚明森,周驰. 电商平台主导型双渠道E-闭环供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(6): 1090-1102.
[3] 田立平,李文龙. 第三方回收企业对闭环供应链的回收与定价策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(11): 2082-2092.
[4] 曾婷婷,李登峰,郑小雪. 考虑互惠偏好的闭环供应链系统合作机制研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(1): 41-62.
[5] 高举红,张莹,李梦梦. 具广告影响的再制造闭环供应链的决策与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(11): 1785-1807.
[6] 周义廷, 刘丽文. 考虑零售商公平关切的双渠道闭环供应链决策与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(9): 1930-1948.
[7] 周岩,胡劲松,赵海瑞,逢晓敏. 具有产能约束和价格干预的闭环供应链网络双渠道均衡[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2012, 32(9): 1072-1091.
[8] 杨玉香,黄祖庆,周根贵. 集权制下闭环供应链网络最优内生污染税问题[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2012, 32(11): 1354-1365.
[9] 魏杰,赵静,李勇建. 模糊环境下基于再制造闭环供应链的博弈问题研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1564-1577.
[10] 聂佳佳,石园. 第三方负责回收闭环供应链的回收责任分担策略选择[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1550-1563.
[11] 周根贵,杨玉香. 闭环供应链网络设施Stackelberg 对策问题[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1491-1503.
[12] 易余胤,肖莉珺. 具强零售商和广告影响的闭环供应链模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1467-1477.
[13] 杨丰梅, 成雅娜, 李健. 基于奖惩契约的闭环供应链协调性研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(10): 1250-1258.
阅读次数
全文


摘要