• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

机队运力配置和USApHMP问题的联合决策模型与算法

张培文1,2,吴江1,汪瑜2,孙宏3   

  1. 1. 西南财经大学统计学院,  成都 611130; 2. 中国民航飞行学院机场工程与运输管理学院,  广汉 618307; 3. 中国民航飞行学院飞行技术与飞行安全科研基地,  广汉 618307
  • 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-24

张培文,吴江,汪瑜,孙宏. 机队运力配置和USApHMP问题的联合决策模型与算法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(8): 1432-1446.

ZHANG Peiwen, WU Jiang, WANG Yu, SUN Hong. A Joint Decision Model and Algorithm for Fleet Capacity and USApHMP Problem[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(8): 1432-1446.

A Joint Decision Model and Algorithm for Fleet Capacity and USApHMP Problem

ZHANG Peiwen 1,2 ,WU Jiang1 ,WANG Yu2 ,SUN Hong3   

  1. 1. School of Statistics, Sothwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130; 2. School of Airport and Transportation Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307; 3. Scientific Base of Flying Technology and Safety, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307
  • Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-24

针对\, USApHMP\, (无容量限制的单分配枢纽网络设计)方法忽略了航空公司航线运力配置 决策对单位客流量成本的影响问题, 以枢纽机场选址、确定枢纽与非枢纽连接关系、航线机型及其 频次选择为决策变量, 综合考虑各城市对市场需求量、航线最大飞行频次、机队可用飞行时间等 限制因素, 以实现航线运力配置成本和枢纽设置成本最小化为目标函数, 建立航线机型匹配及频 次选择问题和\, USApHMP\, 问题的联合决策优化模型, 设计遗传算法进行求解. 算例分析表明: 考虑 \;4\;种机型、\;10\;个城市和 \;90\;个城市对的情况, 与传统枢纽网络设计方法相比, 联 合决策模型的网络总成本降低了\;9.39$\%$, 且航线最大飞行频次是影响枢纽网络设计方案的重要因素.

In order to solve the problem of USApHMP (uncapacitated single allocation $p$-hub location) method neglecting the influence of airline fleet capacity allocation decision on unit passenger flow cost. The location of the hub airport, the connection between hub and non-hub, the selection of the route type and its frequency were regarded as decision variables.The limitations including the passenger demand on each itinerary, available flying frequency on each flight leg, and available block time of each fleet type were considered as constraints. A joint decision mathematical model of fleet route allocation, frequency selection and USApHMP problem was constructed, whose optimization objective was to minimize fleet capacity allocation cost and hub setting cost of airline companies, and which can be solved by a genetic algorithm. The result of example analysis shows that: Take 4 models, 10 cities and 90 pair-cities into consideration, and compared with the traditional hub route network design method, the total network cost of the joint decision model is reduced by 9.39$\%$, and the route maximum flight frequency is an important factor affecting the hub network design.

()
[1] 俞高锋, 李登峰. 网络安全威胁态势评级的变权方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(9): 2477-2491.
[2] 徐蕾艳, 孟志青. 条件风险值下直营连锁企业供销平衡鲁棒策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2149-2169.
[3] 黄晓辉, 卢焱, 唐锡晋. 基于在线媒体的新冠疫情社会舆情多视角分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2182-2198.
[4] 赵振宇, 张垚, 樊伟光. 基于``资源-项目-需求"链的分布式可再生能源项目适应度研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2217-2233.
[5] 谷浩, 毕潇, 王丹, 李刚, 邹晶, 陈明. 基于ResNet和反卷积网络模型的有限角CT图像重建算法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2349-2360.
[6] 李美娟, 潘瑜昕, 徐林明, 卢锦呈. 改进区间数动态 TOPSIS 评价方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(7): 1891-1904.
[7] 李爱忠, 任若恩, 董纪昌. 稀疏网络下核范数回归的连续时间Smart Beta策略[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(7): 1927-1937.
[8] 赵伟, 王钟梅, 吴纯杰. 结合测量误差的检测多元协方差矩阵的EWMA控制图[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(7): 2018-2034.
[9] 彭定洪, 卞志洋. 面向产品设计方案的犹豫模糊 Kansei-TOPSIS 评价方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(6): 1630-1647.
[10] 左凯, 吴文青, 张元元. 修理工多重休假且修理设备可更换的$n$中取$k$温贮备系统研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(6): 1729-1741.
[11] 刘艳霞, 王芝皓, 芮荣祥, 田茂再. 广义函数型部分变系数混合模型的估计[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(6): 1742-1760.
[12] 罗小丽, 戴璐, 练红海, 李谟发, 邓鹏. 具有时滞概率分布的电力系统负荷频率稳定性分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(5): 1245-1255.
[13] 张小英, 王平, 冯红银萍. 常微分方程-薛定谔方程耦合系统的输出反馈镇定[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4): 887-897.
[14] 陈振杰, 傅勤, 郁鹏飞, 张丹. 一类四阶抛物型偏微分多智能体系统的协调控制[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4): 898-912.
[15] 杨贵军, 吴洁琼. Pareto $\pi$ps 抽样的~Horvitz-Thompson 估计量方差研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4): 1150-1163.
阅读次数
全文


摘要