• • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑零售商公平偏好的绿色供应链决策与协调研究

王建华, 王琳   

  1. 江南大学商学院 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-15 修回日期:2021-10-19 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-21
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划重点专项(2018YFC1603300),国家重点研发计划重点专项(2018YFC1603303)资助课题.

王建华, 王琳. 考虑零售商公平偏好的绿色供应链决策与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(2): 386-397.

WANG Jianhua, WANG Lin. Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Considering Fair Preference of Retailers[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(2): 386-397.

Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Considering Fair Preference of Retailers

WANG Jianhua, WANG Lin   

  1. School of Business, Jiangnan University Wuxi 214122
  • Received:2020-12-15 Revised:2021-10-19 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-21
当制造商在绿色供应链中处于领先地位时,此时的零售商处于跟随地位,会关注供应链内的利润分配情况.为探究零售商公平偏好行为对绿色供应链的影响,分别构建了三种不同情形下的供应链博弈模型,比较产品的绿色度水平、市场需求以及各成员获得的利润和效用.研究表明,零售商的公平偏好能增加自身渠道利润的比重,但对制造商和整个系统是不利的;因此,提出了基于成本共担-收益共享的供应链综合协调契约,以改善零售商行为特征对供应链造成的负面影响.
When the manufacturer is in a leading position in the green supply chain, the retailer is in a following position at this time and will pay attention to the profit distribution in the supply chain. This behavior of paying attention to profit distribution is defined as the characteristic of fairness preference. In order to explore the impact of retailers' fair preference behavior on the green supply chain, three supply chain game models under different situations are constructed to compare the greenness level of products, market demands, and the profits and utility of each member. Studies have shown that retailers' fairness preferences can increase the proportion of their channel profits, but it will indirectly reduce the greenness of the product, and the market demand will also decrease, which will have a greater negative impact on the manufacturer and the entire system; therefore, a comprehensive supply chain coordination contract based on cost sharing-revenue sharing is proposed to improve the negative impact of retailer behavior characteristics on the supply chain. Through research, it is found that a certain sharing ratio can not only encourage manufacturers to actively carry out green research and development, but also improve the utility and profit of both manufacturers and retailers. At last, we verify the validity of the contract through numerical simulations.

MR(2010)主题分类: 

()
[1] 张玲.绿色供应链管理——企业经营管理的未来发展趋势. 经营与管理, 2020, 433(7):118-120. (Zhang L. Green supply chain management-The future development trend of enterprise operation and management. Operation and Management, 2020, 433(7):118-120.)
[2] 郭怡, 刘淼, 顾江源.印刷行业绿色供应链管理现状研究. 北京印刷学院学报, 2020, 28(6):148-154. (Guo Y, Liu M, Gu J Y. Research on the current situation of green supply chain management in printing industry. Journal of Beijing Institute of Printing, 2020, 28(6):148-154.)
[3] Dangelico R M, Pujari D. Mainstreaming green product innovation:Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 95(3):471-486.
[4] 李仕林.绿色供应链管理和企业财务绩效关系研究. 物流科技, 2020, 43(4):139-140, 144. (Li S L. Research on the relationship between green supply chain management and enterprise financial performance. Logistics Technology, 2020, 43(4):139-140, 144.)
[5] Pinto L. Green supply chain practices and company performance in Portuguese manufacturing sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 1(1):1-18.
[6] Pan X, Pan X, Song M, et al. The influence of green supply chain management on manufacturing enterprise performance:Moderating effect of collaborative communication. Production Planning and Control, 2019, 31(2):1-14.
[7] 范雪茹, 姚冠新.绿色供应链管理对中小企业绩效的影响研究. 物流科技, 2020, 43(7):119-122, 159. (Fan X R, Yao G X. Research on the impact of green supply chain management on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Logistics Technology, 2020, 43(7):119-122, 159.)
[8] Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(3):817-868.
[9] Christoph H L, Wu Y Z. Social preferences and supply chain performance:An experimental study. Management Science, 2008, 54(11):1835-1849.
[10] Katok E, Pavlov V. Fairness in supply chain contracts:A laboratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 2013, 31(3):129-137.
[11] 张路, 马德青, 胡劲松.具公平行为的闭环供应链动态均衡分析. 数学的实践与认识, 2020, 50(6):26-42. (Zhang L, Ma D Q, Hu J S. Dynamic equilibrium analysis of closed-loop supply chain with fair behavior. Mathematical Practice and Understanding, 2020, 50(6):26-42.)
[12] Zhang Z Y, Fu D X, Zhou Q, et al. Optimal decisions of a green supply chain under the joint action of fairness preference and subsidy to the manufacturer. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, 2020(2):1-18.
[13] Li Q, Chen X, Huang Y. The stability and complexity analysis of a low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern behavior and sales service. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(15):2711.
[14] Zhang L, Xue B, Liu X. Carbon emission reduction with regard to retailer's fairness concern and subsidies. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4):1209.
[15] 黄丽清, 张成科, 朱帮助.考虑公平关切的跨国企业低碳生产策略选择研究. 软科学, 2018, 32(10):97-102. (Huang L Q, Zhang C K, Zhu B Z. Research on the choice of low carbon production strategy of multi-national enterprises considering equity concerns. Soft Science, 2018, 32(10):97-102.)
[16] Sang S. Optimal policies in a green supply chain with reference price effect and fairness concern. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2018, 48(4):466-474.
[17] 公彦德, 陈梦泽.考虑企业社会责任和公平偏好的绿色供应链决策. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(7):1743-1753. (Gong Y D, Chen M Z. Green supply chain decision-making considering corporate social responsibility and equity preference. Control and Decision-Making, 2021, 36(7):1743-1753.)
[18] Ghosh D, Shah J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164(jun):319-329.
[19] 高更君, 吴晴.成本共担视角下的绿色供应链契约协调. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(10):2700-2706. (Gao G J, Wu Q. Green supply chain contract coordination from the perspective of cost sharing. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(10):2700-2706.)
[20] 张红, 黄嘉敏, 崔琰琰.考虑政府补贴下具有公平偏好的绿色供应链博弈模型及契约协调研究. 工业技术经济, 2018, 37(1):111-121. (Zhang H, Huang J M, Cui Y Y. Research on game model and contract coordination of green supply chain with fairness preference under government subsidies. Industrial Technology and Economy, 2018, 37(1):111-121.)
[21] Wang S, Choi S. Pareto-efficient coordination of the contract-based MTO supply chain under flexible cap-and-trade emission constraint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 250(5):119571.1-119571.16.
[22] 杜少甫, 朱贾昂, 高冬, 等. Nash讨价还价公平参考下的供应链优化决策. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3):68-72, 81. (Du S F, Zhu J A, Gao D, et al. Supply chain optimization decision under Nash bargaining equity reference. Journal of Management Science, 2013, 16(3):68-72, 81.)
[1] 苏屹, 王宁. 基于公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2252-2275.
[2] 吴江, 杜亚倩, 张聊东. 考虑产品绿色度的双渠道供应链博弈分析与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2276-2291.
[3] 李真,盛昭瀚,程书萍,孟庆峰. 考虑公平偏好的工程供应链质量优化研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1403-1411.
阅读次数
全文


摘要