• • 上一篇    

政府补贴下双渠道闭环供应链回收渠道的选择研究

王珊珊, 秦江涛   

  1. 上海理工大学管理学院, 上海 200093
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-21 修回日期:2022-04-14 发布日期:2022-11-04
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(71774111)资助课题.

王珊珊, 秦江涛. 政府补贴下双渠道闭环供应链回收渠道的选择研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(10): 2756-2773.

WANG Shanshan, QIN Jiangtao. Research on Recycling Channel of Dual Channel Closed Loop Supply Chain Under Government Subsidy[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(10): 2756-2773.

Research on Recycling Channel of Dual Channel Closed Loop Supply Chain Under Government Subsidy

WANG Shanshan, QIN Jiangtao   

  1. School of Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093
  • Received:2021-04-21 Revised:2022-04-14 Published:2022-11-04
在以制造商为主导的双渠道供应链中,政府制造商进行补贴的前提下,分别建立了三种不同的回收模型:制造商回收、零售商回收和制造商和零售商混合竞争回收,并研究不同模型的最优决策得出结论,最后进行仿真验证.研究表明:制造商垄断回收时,供应链各成员的收益都是关于回收价格敏感系数的增函数;零售商垄断回收时,制造商和零售商的利润降低,此时整个供应链的回收量是制造商回收时的一半;竞争回收模式下,当回收价格敏感系数增大时,制造商利润减小,零售商利润增大,供应链利润先增大后减小,制造商的回收量大于零售商的回收量.在三种模型下,回收价格敏感系数较小时,制造商回收模式最优;回收价格敏感系数较大时,竞争混合回收模式最优.
In the dual channel supply chain dominated by manufacturers,under the premise of government subsidies to manufacturers,three different recycling models are established:Manufacturer recycling,retailer recycling and mixed competitive recycling between manufacturers and retailers.The optimal decisions of different models are studied,and the conclusions are drawn.Finally,the simulation is carried out to verify them.The research shows that when the manufacturer monopolizes recycling,the income of each member of the supply chain is an increasing function of the price sensitivity coefficient of recycling;When retailers monopolize recycling,the profits of manufacturers and retailers are reduced.At this time,the recycling volume of the whole supply chain is half of that of manufacturers;In the competitive recovery mode,when the recovery price sensitivity coefficient increases,the manufacturer's profit decreases,the retailer's profit increases,the supply chain profit first increases and then decreases,and the manufacturer's recovery is greater than that of the retailer.Under the three models,the manufacturer's recycling mode is the best when the recycling price sensitivity coefficient is small;When the recovery price sensitivity coefficient is large,the competitive hybrid recovery model is the best.

MR(2010)主题分类: 

()
[1] 刘志峰,薛雅琼,黄海鸿.我国大陆地区电器电子产品报废量预测研究.环境科学学报, 2016, 36(5):1875-1882.(Liu Z F, Xue Y Q, Huang H H. Prediction of the quantities of waste electric and electronic products in Mainland China. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2016, 36(5):1875-1882.)
[2] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Wassenhove L. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.
[3] Tmc A, Yi B, Lei X C. Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(1):371-380.
[4] 陈建华,梅俊晓,曹菁菁.零售商主导闭环供应链混合回收渠道选择决策.计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3):954-964.(Chen J H, Mei J X, Cao J J. Decisionmaking of hybrid recycling channels selection for closed-loop supply chain with dominant retailer. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(3):954-964.)
[5] 陈章跃,张莉.碳交易政策下混合回收渠道的闭环供应链竞争研究.南阳理工学院学报, 2020, 12(6):24-31.(Chen Z Y, Zhang L. Research on competition of closed-loop supply chain with mixed recycling channels under carbon trading policy. Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology, 2020, 12(6):24-31.)
[6] 孙朝苑,田思源.碳交易政策和广告宣传对供应链回收渠道选择的影响.管理评论, 2020, 32(12):242-252.(Sun C Y, Tian S Y. The impact of carbon trading policy and advertising on the choice of supply chain recycling channels. Management Review, 2020, 32(12):242-252.)
[7] Hong X, Bai X, Song Y. Selection of product recycling channels based on extended TODIM method. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 168(5):114295.
[8] Ranjbar Y, Sahebi H, Ashayeri J, et al. A competitive dual recycling channel in a three-level closed loop supply chain under different power structures:Pricing and collecting decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 272:122623.
[9] Zhu X D, Wei L, Lei X. The pricing strategy of dual recycling channels for power batteries of new energy vehicles under government subsidies. Complexity, 2020, 2020:1-16.
[10] 白世贞,张雪莲.基于不同补贴方式的双回收渠道闭环供应链定价研究.生态经济, 2020, 36(7):95-104.(Bai S Z, Zhang X L. Research on the pricing of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channels. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(7):95-104.)
[11] 张雪莲.不同政府补贴政策下双回收渠道闭环供应链定价决策研究.博士论文.哈尔滨商业大学,哈尔滨, 2020.(Zhang X L. Study on the pricing decision of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel under different government subsidy policies. Doctoral Dissertation. Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 2020.)
[12] 林贵华,单仁邦,陈拼博.政府补贴下闭环供应链回收渠道的选择策略.运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4):43-53.(Lin G H, Shan R B, Chen P B. Selection strategies of recycling channels in closed-loop supply chain under government subsidy. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(4):43-53.)
[13] 孙嘉轶,陈伟,杨双飞,等.考虑消费者偏好及公平关切的闭环供应链决策研究.计算机集成制造系统:1-17. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.tp.20210320.1814.002.html. (Sun J Y, Chen W, Yang S F, et al. Decision research of closed-loop supply chain considering consumer preference and fairness concern. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems:1-17. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.tp.20210320.1814.002.html.)
[14] Yan B, Chen Z, Liu Y, et al. Pricing decision and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain dominated by a risk-aversion retailer under demand disruption. RAIRO-Operations Research, 2021, 55(2):433-456.
[15] 徐颖,刘勤明,周林森.基于博弈论的闭环双渠道回收供应链决策研究.系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(2):396-408.(Xu Y, Liu Q M, Zhou L S. Research on decision-making of closed-loop supply chain for dual-channel recovery based on game theory. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(2):396-408.)
[16] 陈佳媛,周刚.不同主导权结构下的双渠道供应链定价策略及协调机制研究.综合运输, 2021, 43(1):87-97.(Chen J Y, Zhou G. Pricing strategy and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain under different dominant structures. China Transportation Review, 2021, 43(1):87-97.)
[17] 林志炳,吴清.考虑随机参照价格的双渠道绿色供应链定价和渠道策略研究.计算机集成制造系统:1-19. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20210122.1535.014.html. (Lin Z B, Wu Q. Pricing and channel strategies in a dual-channel green supply chain with stochastic reference price. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems:1-19. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20210122.1535.014.html.)
[18] 于晓辉,李敏,叶兆兴,等.基于公平关切的双渠道低碳供应链博弈分析.系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(1):221-237.(Yu X H, Li M, Ye Z X, et al. Game analysis of two-channel low-carbon supply chain based on equity concerns. Journal of Systems and Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(1):221-237.)
[19] Zhang C, Wang Y X, Zhang L F. Risk-averse preferences in a dual-channel supply chain with trade credit and demand uncertainty. RAIRO-Operations Research, 2021, 55:2879-2903.
[20] 李春发,解雯倩,楚明森,等.电商平台主导型双渠道E-闭环供应链定价与协调研究.系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(6):1090-1102.(Li C F, Xie W Q, Chu M S, et al. Pricing and coordination mechanism design of dual-channel e-closed-loop supply chain dominated by E-commerce platform. Journal of Systems and Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(6):1090-1102.)
[21] 康晨阳.信息不对称时双渠道销售和不同回收模式下闭环供应链的定价策略.硕士论文.青岛大学,青岛, 2019.(Kang C Y. Pricing strategy of closed-loop supply chain under dual channel sales and different recycling modes when information is asymmetric. Master Thesis. Qingdao University, Qingdao, 2019.)
[22] 夏西强,朱庆华.政府不同补贴策略对单/双渠道回收影响研究.中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11):88-98.(Xia X Q, Zhu Q H. Study on the impact of different government subsidy strategies on single/double recycling channels. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11):88-98.)
[23] 李文龙,王雪,李璐璐,等.考虑价格敏感度的闭环供应链回收模式选择研究.生态经济, 2020, 36(8):206-212.(Li W L, Wang X, Li L L, et al. The selection of loop supply chain recycling mode considering price sensitivity. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(8):206-212.)
[24] 公彦德,蒋雨薇,达庆利.不同混合回收模式和权力结构的逆向供应链决策分析.中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10):131-143.(Gong Y D, Jiang Y W, Da Q L. Decision analysis of reverse supply chain with different mixture recycling modes and power structures. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(10):131-143.)
[25] 田立平,李文龙.第三方回收企业对闭环供应链的回收与定价策略研究.系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(11):2082-2092.(Tian L P, Li W L. Research on recycling and pricing strategies of closed-loop supply chain by third-party recycling enterprises. Journal of Systems and Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(11):2082-2092.)
[1] 姜旭, 卓越, 姜西雅. 政府补贴下基于供应链社会责任的回收模式研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(9): 2448-2461.
[2] 朱琴, 韩小花. 基于在线评论的制造商产品再制造与价格策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(8): 2040-2061.
[3] 苏屹, 王宁. 基于公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2252-2275.
[4] 山珊,刘颖琦,叶顺心. 面向付费类交通PPP项目的价格设计与补贴动态调整方案研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(6): 944-953.
[5] 梅生伟,魏韡. 智能电网环境下主从博弈模型及应用实例[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2014, 34(11): 1331-1344.
[6] 卢强,梅生伟. 现代电力系统控制评述---清华大学电力系统国家重点实验室相关科研工作缩影及展望[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2012, 32(10): 1207-1225.
[7] 李响,李勇建. 随机环境下考虑回收定价和销售定价的逆向供应链优化与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1511-1523.
[8] 曹二保;赖明勇. 基于需求和生产成本偏差的Cournot竞争供应链协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2010, 30(10): 1313-1322.
[9] 王龙;伏锋;陈小杰;楚天广;谢广明. 演化博弈与自组织合作[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2007, 27(3): 330-343.
阅读次数
全文


摘要