碳标签制度下基于AT解的三级供应链收益分配研究

吴军, 巴依勒, 郝伟怡, 岳利媛

系统科学与数学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 955-964.

PDF(494 KB)
PDF(494 KB)
系统科学与数学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 955-964. DOI: 10.12341/jssms21575

碳标签制度下基于AT解的三级供应链收益分配研究

    吴军1, 巴依勒1, 郝伟怡2, 岳利媛1
作者信息 +

Revenue Allocation of Three-Level Supply Chain Based on AT Solution Under Carbon Labeling System

    WU Jun1, BA Yile1, HAO Weiyi2, YUE Liyuan1
Author information +
文章历史 +

Abstract

It is of great significance to study the issue of supply chain revenue allocation under the carbon labeling system. This paper takes the three-level supply chain with restricted alliance structure as the research object, analyzes the four possible cooperative emission reduction alliance situations that may be formed by the three-level supply chain composed of supplier, manufacturer, and retailer, and uses AT solution and Shapley value distribute the revenue of cooperative emissions reduction. The results show that the total revenue of the supply chain is the largest when the participants in the supply chain make centralized decisions, and the distribution of revenue using the AT solution takes into account the role of the participants in the supply chain structure. Compared with the Shapley value, the distribution result is more reasonable and effective.

关键词

三级供应链 / 碳标签 / 限制联盟 / 收益分配 / AT解

Key words

Three-level supply chain / carbon label / restricted alliance / revenue allocation / AT solution

引用本文

导出引用
吴军 , 巴依勒 , 郝伟怡 , 岳利媛. 碳标签制度下基于AT解的三级供应链收益分配研究. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(4): 955-964. https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms21575
WU Jun , BA Yile , HAO Weiyi , YUE Liyuan. Revenue Allocation of Three-Level Supply Chain Based on AT Solution Under Carbon Labeling System. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(4): 955-964 https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms21575
中图分类号: 91A10    91A12   

参考文献

[1] 程永宏,熊中楷.碳标签制度下产品碳足迹与定价决策及协调.系统工程学报, 2016, 31(3):386-397.(Cheng Y H, Xiong Z K. Product carbon footprint and pricing decisions and coordination under carbon labeling system. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2016, 31(3):386-397.)
[2] 申成然,刘小媛.碳标签制度下供应商参与碳减排的供应链决策研究.工业工程, 2018, 21(6):72-80.(Shen C R, Liu X Y. Study on supply chain decision-making of suppliers participating in carbon emission reduction under the carbon labeling system. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2018, 21(6):72-80.)
[3] 潘永明,邹丁华,张志武.基于碳标签制度的两级供应链协调机制研究.中国管理科学, 202129(1):109-115.(Pan Y M, Zou D H, Zhang Z W. Research on two-level supply chain coordination mechanism based on carbon labeling system. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1):109-115.)
[4] Huettner F. A proportional value for cooperative games with a coalition structure. Theory and Decision, 2015, 78(2):273-287.
[5] 王利明.一类具有限制联盟结构的合作对策的两阶段Shapley值.运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5):56-60.(Wang L M. Two stage Shapley value of a cooperative game with restricted alliance structure. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5):56-60.)
[6] 杨洁,赖礼邦.考虑联盟结构的联合采购合作剩余分配博弈分析.运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6):91-95.(Yang J, Lai L B. Game Analysis of surplus allocation of joint purchasing cooperation considering alliance structure. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(6):91-95.)
[7] Myerson R B. Graphs and cooperation in games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1977, 2(3):225-229.
[8] Herings P, Laan G, Talman D. The average tree solution for cycle-free graph games. Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, 62(1):77-92.
[9] Herings P, Laan G, Talman D, et al. The average tree solution for cooperative games with communication structure. Games and Economic Behavior, 2010, 68(2):626-633.
[10] 单而芳,曾晗,韩佳玉.无圈超图对策上的有效平均树解.系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(3):781-789.(Shan E F, Zeng H, Han J Y. The efficient average tree solution for cycle-free hypergraph games. System Engineering-Theory&Practice, 2021, 41(3):781-789.)
[11] 吕璞,马可心.基于相对风险分担的集群供应链协同创新收益分配机制研究.运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9):115-123.(Lü P, Ma K X. Revenue allocation for cooperative innovation based on relative risk in cluster supply chain. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(9):115-123.)
[12] 杨洁,赖礼邦.具有限制结盟结构的供应链合作创新及其收益分配.运筹与管理, 2018,27(2):48-53.(Yang J, Lai L B. Supply chain cooperative innovation and its revenue distribution with restricted alliance structure. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(2):48-53.)
[13] 单而芳,吴美慧,吕文蓉,等.基于位置值的四级供应链创新联盟及收益分配.工业工程与管理, 2021, 26(1):36-43.(Shan E F, Wu M H, Lü W R, et al. Four-level supply chain innovation alliance and revenue distribution based on location value. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2021, 26(1):36-43.)
[14] Yalabik B, Fairchild R J. Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 131(2):519-527.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71372195),北京市社会科学基金一般项目(17GLB014),北京化工大学一流学科建设专项资金资助(XK1802-5),北京化工大学基地项目(G-JD202002)资助课题.
PDF(494 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/